Sample Metadata Record

oai:anla.uaf.edu:CA961K1962c

XML format

<olac:olac>
   <dc:title>Athabaskan Isogloss Maps </dc:title>
   <dc:contributor xsi:type="olac:role" olac:code="author">Krauss, Michael E.</dc:contributor>
   <dc:creator>Krauss, Michael E.</dc:creator>
   <dc:date>1962</dc:date>
   <dc:description>(1) Consonant series in northern Athabaskan, 1962. 4 pp. (2) Alaskan bands, checkpoints, isoglosses, 1962~63. 5 pp. (3) Tracings of (2) with language definitions, isoglosses, 1963. 8 pp. Ms. Some of (2) and (3) were presented in Krauss 1969b, 1970b. Comments: Has been digitized</dc:description>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:subject>dialectology</dc:subject>
   <dc:type xsi:type="dcterms:DCMIType">Text</dc:type>
</olac:olac>

Display format

 Title  Athabaskan Isogloss Maps
 Contributor (author)  Krauss, Michael E.
 Creator  Krauss, Michael E.
 Date   1962
 Description  (1) Consonant series in northern Athabaskan, 1962. 4 pp. (2) Alaskan bands, checkpoints, isoglosses, 1962~63. 5 pp. (3) Tracings of (2) with language definitions, isoglosses, 1963. 8 pp. Ms. Some of (2) and (3) were presented in Krauss 1969b, 1970b. Comments: Has been digitized
 Format  application/pdf
 Subject  dialectology
 Type (DCMI)  Text

Metadata quality analysis

OLAC metadata records are scored for metadata quality on a 10-point scale explained in OLAC Metadata Metrics. The score for the above record (along with comments on changes that could improve the score) is as follows:

Component + - Comments
Title   1   0 
Date   1   0 
Agent   1   0 
About   1   0 
Depth   0   1  For the full score, add at least 6 more elements in addition to the ones counted explicitly in other components of the score.
Content Language   0   1  Add a dc:language element with an ISO 639-3 code to identify the language in which the resource is written or spoken.
Subject Language   1   0 
OLAC Type   0   1  Add a dc:type element that uses the OLAC linguistic-type encoding scheme to identify the type of the resource from a linguistic point of view.
DCMI Type   1   0 
Precision   0.33   0.67  For the full score, make use of at least 2 more encoding schemes in addition to the ones counted explicitly in other components of the score. For instance,
  • use dcterms:W3CDTF on dc:date (or its refinements)
  • use dcterms:IMT on dc:format
Quality score  6.33