Sample Metadata Record
<olac:olac>
<dc:title>Angami Phonetic Reader</dc:title>
<dc:creator>N.Ravindran</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1974</dc:date>
<dc:description>Price: Rs.7.00</dc:description>
<dc:description>Pages: XIV + 66 </dc:description>
</olac:olac>
| Title | Angami Phonetic Reader |
| Creator | N.Ravindran |
| Date | 1974 |
| Description | Price: Rs.7.00 |
| Description | Pages: XIV + 66 |
OLAC metadata records are scored for metadata quality on a 10-point scale explained in OLAC Metadata Metrics. The score for the above record (along with comments on changes that could improve the score) is as follows:
| Component | + | - | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | 1 | 0 | |
| Date | 1 | 0 | |
| Agent | 1 | 0 | |
| About | 1 | 0 | |
| Depth | 0 | 1 | For the full score, add at least 6 more elements in addition to the ones counted explicitly in other components of the score. |
| Content Language | 0 | 1 | Add a dc:language element with an ISO 639-3 code to identify the language in which the resource is written or spoken. |
| Subject Language | 1 | 0 | |
| OLAC Type | 0 | 1 | Add a dc:type element that uses the OLAC linguistic-type encoding scheme to identify the type of the resource from a linguistic point of view. |
| DCMI Type | 0 | 1 | Add a dc:type element that uses the DCMIType encoding scheme to identify the generic type of the resource. |
| Precision | 0 | 1 | For the full score, make use of at least 3
more encoding schemes in addition to the ones counted explicitly in other components of
the score. For instance,
|
| Quality score | 5 | ||